The Ten Experiments

Utts, Jessica: Utts, Jessica, September 1995

Of the ten experiments done at SAIC, six of them involved remote viewing and four did not. Rather than list the details in the body of this report, Appendix 2 gives a brief description of the experiments. What follows is a discussion of the methodology and results for the experiments as a whole. Because of the fundamental differences between remote viewing and the other types of experiments, we discuss them separately.

In the memorandum of 25 July 1995, Dr. May provided the review team with details of the ten experiments, including a short title, number of trials, effect size and overall p-value for each one. His list was in time sequence. It is reproduced in Table 1, using his numbering system, with the experiments categorized by type, then sequentially within type. The effect size estimates are based on a limited number of trials, so they are augmented with an interval to show the probable range of the true effect (e.g. .124±.071 indicates a range from .053 to .195). Remember that an effect size of 0 represents chance, while a positive effect size indicates positive results.

TABLE 1: SAIC EXPERIMENTS LISTED BY DR. EDWIN MAY
Expr Title Trials Effect Size p-value
Remote Viewing Experiments
1 Target dependencies 200 .124±.071 0.040
4 AC with binary coding 40 -.067±.158 0.664
5 AC lucid dreams, base 24 .088±.204 0.333
6 AC lucid dreams, pilot 21 .368±.218 0.046
9 ERD AC Behavior 70 .303±.120 0.006
10 Entropy II 90 .550±.105 9.1×10-8
Other Experiments
2 AC of binary targets 300 .123±.058 0.017
3 MEG Replication 12,000s MCE MCE
7 Remote observation 48 .361±.144 0.006
8 ERD EEG investigation 7,000s MCE MCE