In summary, it is evident from the data presented in this chapter that the vast majority of the incidents investigated in other states have been resolved by authorities as "predator/ scavenger damage." This is particularly true in states such as Oklahoma where the problem has been more thoroughly studied. The role played by the media in fostering the mutilation phenomenon is also apparent in this chapter, particularly in the discussion of the Colorado and Arkansas incidents.
As noted in my introductory remarks, the information obtained from other states closely parallels that which I collected in New Mexico. As in New Mexico, the media accounts from other states tend to promote the bizarre nature of livestock mutilations, whereas the data received from qualified investigators and experienced veterinarians basically confirm the conclusions I have reached in my New Mexico investigation -- that the vast majority of reported mutilations are induced by scavengers.
In the few cases where human involvement was determined, the culprits were not highly sophisticated "surgeons" but pranksters, publicity seekers, and other ordinary individuals. In short, the "classic mutilation" as a widespread phenomenon endangering the livestock industry does not stand up to close scrutiny of the facts.
In regard to drugs, see Appendix IV.